Group: soc.culture.china
From: "ltlee1@hotmail.com"
Date: Tuesday, March 04, 2008 5:50 AM
Subject: Re: RMB shoud depreciate to solve China's inflation problem

On Feb 29, 1:01 pm, "ltl...@" wrote:
> The following is from today's Xinhu news. The author of hte article is
> Visiting Prof in Finance, Xiamen University.
>
> /comments/2008-02/29/
>
> One of his argument is:
>
> =D2=BB=B8=F6=B9=FA=BC=D2=C3=BB=D3=D0=C0=ED=D3=C9=D4=DA=B4=E6=D4=DA=BE=
=DE=B6=EE=CD=E2=BB=E3=B4=A2=B1=B8=B5=C4=C7=E9=BF=F6=CF=C2=D1=A1=D4=F1=CD=E2=
=BB=E3=B1=E1=D6=B5=BA=CD=B1=BE=B1=D2=C9=FD=D6=B5=A3=AC
> =B8=FC=C3=BB=D3=D0=C0=ED=D3=C9=D4=DA=CD=A8=BB=F5=C5=F2=D5=CD=B3=F6=CF=D6=
=C9=F5=D6=C1=BC=D3=BE=E7=B5=C4=C7=E9=BF=F6=CF=C2=BC=CC=D0=F8=D1=A1=D4=F1=B1=
=BE=B1=D2=C9=FD=D6=B5=C9=F5=D6=C1=BC=D3=CB=D9=C9=FD=D6=B5=A1=A3
> =CD=A8=BB=F5=C5=F2=D5=CD=B5=C4=B3=F6=CF=D6=CA=C7=B1=BE=B1=D2=D3=C9=C9=FD=
=D6=B5=D7=AA=CF=F2=B1=E1=D6=B5=B5=C4=B7=D6=CB=AE=C1=EB=A3=AC=D5=E2=CA=C7=D6=
=C6=B6=A8=BB=E3=C2=CA=D5=FE=B2=DF=B5=C4=B3=A3=CA=B6=A1=A3
> =C3=E6=B6=D4=B3=A3=CA=B6=A3=AC=CE=D2=C3=C7=B2=BB=D3=A6=B8=C3"=B4=B4=D0=C2"=
=A1=A3
>
> A country has no reason to chose foreign reserve's depreciating and
> its own
> currency's appreciation when it has hugh pile of foreign reserve. It
> has less
> reason to appreciate its currency wheninflationhas appeared or
> accelerating.
> The appearance of inflaiton should be the watershed between
> appreciation and
> depreciation. This is common sense in exchanging rate policy making.
> In the
> face of such common sense, we should not "innovate."
>
> Comments?

/comments/2008-03/04/

Another article of the same series.

This one discusses what is behind inflation and the Balassa-Samuelson
effect.
It rejects the call for faster rmb appreciation because such calls is
based on
the proponents' misinterpretation of the Balassa-Samuelson effect.

Whether one agrees with faster RMB appreciation or not, the media is
serving the
readers well by presenting the arguments in an easy to understand way.